gpt talking to gpt?

Arnav, today’s newsletter isn’t about winning, it’s about the journey of winning

umm. if you understood with the above line what I meant, you know what this is

it’s the overuse of AI

first, we used to get frustrated when we spotted ai lingo when our content team wrote

but when the clients do it, then what 😢

i mean i get it, but sometimes the issue is AI is going to give feedback because you’ve asked it to

the issue: it doesn’t know what you want. it can read images when you send it a doc.

it’s just giving feedback for the heck of it when it doesn’t even know the topic / intent / goal

if i ask ai to give feedback on the tweet when im a cardiovascular surgeon. it will make it for dummies

is that what i want? do i want what everyone is doing? does the same thing work for everyone?

NOPE

so yes, this is a rant

and a polite ask.

clients often say: send me a one pager as a proposal

my ask: send us pointers with actual feedback you have. it takes minutes

it’s easy for me to run the client’s feedback and our work in gpt and say fix

but that defeats the purpose of working together and being different to get results

if this is how it continues. it’ll be agents talking to agents. let’s go back to humans talking to humans plejjjj

let’s normalise human reviews, human feedback, and human effort.

we’re doing work for your audience. not for their agents

on another note, a lot of cool things happened this week:

1. first edition of 2 new clients scheduled!!!

2. that’s how much we made a client through ads last month (just one of the clients)

3. we’re in the final stages of proposal / discussion with 2 big leads 👀